|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verifying Flowmeter Accuracy | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Need for Field Testing of Flowmeters Accurate data from open channel flowmeters are essential to the decision process regarding the current adequacy and the need for upgrading municipal wastewater collection systems. Engineering studies that misstate the true performance of a municipal wastewater collection system can result in costly errors resulting in misspent public funds and potential liabilities. The measurement of flow in open channel sewers can be complex. Recently portable flowmeters that measure both velocity and area and calculate flow based on the Continuity Equation Q = V x A have become the industry choice. However, there currently is concern in the wastewater industry over the performance of some of the popular brands. Flow Lab Tests Because of the expense of these laboratory tests, most users tend to rely upon either the manufacturers specifications or the tests of others. In some cases, users attempt to test the meters themselves under available field conditions. Furthermore, since meters generally perform worse in the field than under ideal laboratory conditions, there is an additional need to determine the performance of instruments in the field. Traditional Field Testing Methods Dye Dilution Method Salt Dilution Method Portable Velocity Meters To measure the average velocity of flow in an open channel such as a sewer, multiple velocity readings are generally taken at defined locations throughout the cross- section and these velocity readings averaged to obtain the average stream velocity. In general, the average velocity can be measured to approximately ±5% by utilizing good field practices. Lift Station as a Field Hydraulic Laboratory It is obvious that by knowing the dimensions of the wet well (including any variations in cross-section over the minimum to maximum wet well levels) and by monitoring the rate of rise of the water in the wet well, the inflow rate can be continuously monitored and even rapidly changing inflow during storm events can be tracked. By measuring the instantaneous fill characteristic of each cycle one ends up with a piecewise curve that is a very accurate representation of the inflow during the fill time. This piecewise data can be input into a PC and a best-fit curve performed to better estimate the flow rate during the evacuation period when the inflow rate is not being measured. This setup provides a near-perfect laboratory for meter testing and the accuracy (typically ±1%) of this "field standard" is unsurpassed in accuracy by any of the previously described techniques. An added bonus of this technique is that the test can take place over long periods, including storms and without personnel needing to be at the test site. Conclusion
To request more information on the Marsh-McBirney line of flowmeters click here...
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Copyright
Hach/Marsh-McBirney All rights reserved. |
||||||